May 2, 2008 at 2:42 pm · Filed under Forex
Disclaimer: Forex trading involves high risks, with the potential for substantial losses and is not suitable for all persons. The views expressed in this blogsite are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or opinions of AlterForex.
Watch Jim Martens, Senior Currency Strategist at Elliott Wave International, the world’s largest market forecasting firm, give tips on how to trade forex with Elliott wave analysis – free.
The U.S. dollar is the current center of the global financial community’s attention, and it will likely stay in the spotlight for a while. That could be good for the forex market – and you, a forex trader.
Already the largest and most liquid market on the planet – with the daily volume ten times larger than the combined daily turnover on all of the world’s stock exchanges – recent focus on the dollar is likely to attract even more currency speculators. And that means even more volume and liquidity – a nimble trader’s paradise.
Winning in forex is not easy. You need skill, discipline – and sometimes, just pure luck. You also need a method. You may have heard that Elliott wave analysis is something many forex traders use. It’s true; wave analysis is not a crystal ball, but it helps you accomplish three crucial goals: Identify the trend, stay with it, and get out when the trend is likely over.
Elliott Wave International’s website gives you multiple resources that teach you Elliott. Of course, nothing helps you learn faster than watching a good teacher. That’s why you don’t want to miss this free opportunity to learn from one of the best forex Elliotticians out there.*
Your FREE Video Lesson: How To Trade Forex With Elliott Wave
What you are about to see is a condensed, 20-plus-minute version of Jim Martens’ live course on trading with Elliott to an audience of independent investors in Denver, CO, recorded in early November 2007. Here’s what you’ll learn:
- At its core, Elliott wave analysis is simple. Watch Jim explain why.
- What Elliott waves are best for trading forex?
- How do I identify trade setups?
- At what point in a wave pattern do I enter a trade?
- How do I manage risk with Elliott? Etc.
Your FREE Report: Take Advantage of News Using Elliott Wave Analysis
If you’ve ever felt you could be better at trading forex around economic report releases, this is a must-read. The Forex Journal, one of the premiere forex trading magazines, recently selected this report by Jim Martens as the main feature and cover page.
Join Club EWI to gain access to your Forex video and report, FREE! It takes just 30 seconds. Club EWI is the world’s largest Elliott Wave Community with more than 125,000 members. It only takes a minute to sign up and it’s absolutely free.
*Who is Jim Martens?
Jim Martens was first introduced to the Wave Principle in 1985. Since then, he’s built an impressive resume, having worked for such firms as Bank of New York and Nexus Capital Limited, a George Soros-affiliated hedge fund. Since 2005, Jim has been Elliott Wave International’s senior forex analyst – and one of the best teachers of the method.
April 12, 2008 at 3:38 pm · Filed under Forex, Financial
Disclaimer: Forex trading involves high risks, with the potential for substantial losses and is not suitable for all persons. The views expressed in this blogsite are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or opinions of AlterForex.
By Susan C. Walker, Elliott Wave International
Each year, the NCAA college basketball tournament winnows its starting field of 64 teams to the Final Four teams who play for a chance to become the national champion. Congratulations to the University of Kansas and the University of Tennessee, this year’s men’s and women’s basketball champions.
The structure of the NCAA tournament got me to thinking. Wouldn’t it be great if we could set up brackets for our own investments the same way – start with 64 equities, bonds, mutual funds, commodity futures, metals, etc. Then let them duke it out against one another to see which ones emerge as the “Investment Final Four”?
Click here to download a free 5-page report from Elliott Wave International with even more information on which investment does best during recessions. The report, excerpted from Bob Prechter’s Elliott Wave Theorist, includes in-depth historical analysis and six eye-opening tables.
Since most of us have neither the time nor the money to act as our own version of the NCAA (which might stand for the “National Coordinator of Asset Allocation”), it’s worth knowing that Bob Prechter of Elliott Wave International has already set his mind to the task. He has specifically explored which investments do best in times of recession and which do best during economic expansions. But instead of starting with a field of 64 investments, he researched the three most popular investments – gold, the Dow, and Treasury bonds. We can call them the Treasured Three, rather than the Final Four.
Gold and Recessions
Since economists and even Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, now admit that it looks like the U.S. economy has entered a recession, many people may wonder whether they need to change the mix of their investments. In particular, as some prices keep going up – notably for food and gas – the threat of inflation makes people more interested in gold as an investment, since it’s usually seen as a bulwark against monetary inflation.
It is this conventional wisdom that piqued Prechter’s curiosity. He wanted to find out whether it would hold up to a reality test. As he writes in The Elliott Wave Theorist, “I have often read, ‘Gold always goes up in recessions and depressions.’ Is it true? Should you own gold because you think the economy is tanking? Whenever we hear some claim like this, we always do the same thing: We look at the data.”
So he and another Elliott wave analyst ran the numbers, reviewing the behavior of these three key investments during recessions following World War II, from February 1945 through November 2001. This is what they learned:
Gold was not the best investment during recessions in terms of total return.
The winner of this tournament was actually Treasury Notes, which had a total return of 9.96%. In contrast, gold had a total return of 8.80%, and the Dow came in at 6.89%. But that’s not all – once they figured in the transaction costs for each investment (at a 2008 level), gold fell from second to third place as a worthwhile investment during recessions. The total returns with transaction costs came out this way:
- T-Notes 9.82%
- Dow 6.85%
- Gold 4.80%
This result turns conventional wisdom on its head. It’s also worth being aware of as you invest in 2008. Here’s how Prechter sums up the results:
The Best Investment During Recessions
The most important question, however, is not whether the Dow beat gold or vice versa but whether making either investment would have been better than taking no risk at all. Table 3 [see free report provided by Elliott Wave International] shows that ten-year Treasury notes beat both gold and the Dow during recessions since 1945, and they did so far more reliably. T-notes provided a capital gain in 10 of the 11 recessions, and of course they provided interest income during all of them. And the transaction costs are low….
So if you want to make money reliably and safely during recessions and depression, you should own bonds whose issuers will remain fully reliable debtors throughout the contraction. Of course, as Conquer the Crash [Editor’s note: Bob Prechter’s best-selling business book] makes abundantly clear, finding such bonds in this depression, which will be the deepest in 300 years, will not be easy. Conquer the Crash forecast that in this depression most bonds will go down and many will go to zero. This process has already begun. This time around, you have to follow the suggestions in that book to make your debt investment work. [The Elliott Wave Theorist, March 2008]
Susan C. Walker writes for Elliott Wave International, a market forecasting and technical analysis company. She has been an associate editor with Inc. magazine, a newspaper writer and editor, an investor relations executive and a speechwriter for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Her columns also appear regularly on FoxNews.com.
January 24, 2008 at 3:40 pm · Filed under Stocks, Financial
Everyone wants to know, “Is the worst over for stocks?” If you’re familiar with Bob Prechter and his work, you won’t be surprised that his short answer is “NO.” But … it’s his long answer that is much more compelling, including insights into what you should be doing NOW to prepare for what’s still to come.
You just watched Bob’s short answer. For his long answer, you must join his free community, Club EWI. CLICK HERE TO JOIN NOW
January 7, 2008 at 8:58 pm · Filed under Forex
Disclaimer: Forex trading involves high risks, with the potential for substantial losses and is not suitable for all persons. The views expressed in this blogsite are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or opinions of AlterForex.
By Susan C. Walker, Elliott Wave International
In the bleak midwinter,
Frosty wind made moan,
Earth stood hard as iron,
Water like a stone…
(From "A Christmas Carol" by Christina Rossetti)
Shawn Colvin sings a beautiful song based on this poem by Christina Rossetti, reminding us of the bleakness of midwinter. That is exactly where the housing market seems to be now – facing its very own bleak midwinter of falling prices, rising mortgage rates and growing inventories.
The latest report of the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index shows that the price of houses fell 6.7% in October, year over year. That is the largest year-to-year decline drop since April 1991. Think of it – if you had bought a home for $300,000 in October 2006, it is now worth about $280,000. And suppose you just got a new job and need to move? You are going to have trouble selling it at that price, too, thanks to so many foreclosed homes on the market. One realtor in Phoenix explained to a Wall Street Journal reporter that local residents are now competing with foreclosed homes selling for $50,000 to $100,000 less than other houses on the market. "The sellers now are having to reduce their prices by 20% to 30% to compete," she says. (Wall Street Journal, "Pace of Decline in Home Prices Sets a Record," 12/27/07)
At a meeting of the New York Society of Security Analysts on January 7, U.S. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson said this about the U.S. economy: "We will likely have further indications of slower growth in the weeks and months ahead.”
Paulson and central bankers at the U.S. Federal Reserve recognize that they, too, face their own bleak financial midwinter. It’s not just the mayhem brought on by the subprime mortgage debacle, the implosion of the housing market and the ensuing credit crunch; nor is it that the U.S. economy lurches toward a recession and hard times.
No, it is something bigger than that. Public opinion or social mood, as we call it here at Elliott Wave International, has shifted from positive to negative. When that happens, financial heroes find themselves falling from their pedestals onto frozen earth hard as iron.
Exhibit A - The headline of a recent article on Bloomberg: "Paulson Gets Diminishing Return with Bush, Like Powell, O’Neill" and the lead: "Henry Paulson escaped the Nixon White House with his reputation enhanced. He won’t be so lucky this time around."
Exhibit B - The lead from a recent column by David Ignatius in the Washington Post:
"When airport rescue crews are worried that a damaged plane may have a crash landing, they sometimes spread the runway with foam to reduce the probability of fire on impact. That’s what the Federal Reserve and other central banks are doing in pumping liquidity into severely damaged financial markets. Make no mistake: The central bankers’ announcement Wednesday of a new coordinated effort to pump cash into the global financial system is a sign of their nervousness…."
Nervousness is in the air now. Investors are anxious about the markets; everyone is worried about the housing market. Our Elliott Wave Financial Forecast December issue explains how housing starts (and stops) are intimately tied to recessions: "One key indicator of success in pre-dating economic downturns is housing starts, which are approaching the 1-million-a-month level that has preceded all recessions of the last 40 years."
And the Fed is nervous, too. So much so that it announced a credit giveaway with four other major central banks (the Bank of Canada, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and the Swiss National Bank) in mid-December to try to bolster the financial system and the banks that keep it humming. The Fed reports that banks have been stepping up to its auction window each week to purchase $20 billion. Unfortunately for the banks, most of this "liquidity" isn’t that liquid. It has to be paid back within 30 days, with interest of about 4.65%.
Editor’s note: Elliott Wave International has agreed to make available to our readers a 2-1/2-page excerpt from Bob Prechter’s Elliott Wave Theorist in which he describes exactly how the Fed’s latest effort to shore up banks’ balance sheets has become "High Noon for the Fed’s Credibility." Click here to read the Theorist excerpt.
Just how bleak is the future for central bankers if this recently implemented plan doesn’t work? Bob Prechter explains in his just-published Theorist:
"Nevertheless, this is probably the single most important central-bank pronouncement yet. But it is not significant for the reasons people think. By far most people take such pronouncements at face value, presume that what the authorities promise will happen and reason from there. But the tremendous significance of this seismic engagement of the monetary jawbone is that if this announcement fails to restore confidence, central bankers’ credibility will evaporate."
"At least that’s the way historians will play it. But of course, the true causality, as elucidated by socionomics, is that an evaporation of confidence will make the central bankers’ plans fail. The outcome is predicated on psychology."
The "socionomics" Prechter refers to is a new social science he has introduced that studies how humans behave in groups within contexts of uncertainty – where fluctuations in social mood motivate social actions. It explains that rather than an event happening that affects social mood (for example, falling home prices make people feel bad), what really happens is that social mood changes first from positive to negative and then lousy things happen (for example, unhappy people make home prices fall). If you can adopt this point of view, then you can see that, in poetic terms, we are fast approaching a bleak midwinter for the economy and the financial markets.
Susan C. Walker writes for Elliott Wave International, a market forecasting and technical analysis company. She has been an associate editor with Inc. magazine, a newspaper writer and editor, an investor relations executive and a speechwriter for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Her columns also appear regularly on FoxNews.com.
November 29, 2007 at 2:57 pm · Filed under Financial
Disclaimer: Forex trading involves high risks, with the potential for substantial losses and is not suitable for all persons. The views expressed in this blogsite are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or opinions of AlterForex.
By Susan C. Walker, Elliott Wave International
The world is awash in bad news about the subprime mortgage meltdown, just the same way that New Orleans was awash in floodwaters from Hurricane Katrina two summers ago. A few examples:
- The median price for new home drops 13% since last year, the most in 37 years, according to a Census Bureau report on November 29. This due in large part to buyers not being able to get financing now that lenders have tightened their lending standards in response to the subprime debacle.
- Major Wall Street banks write off billions of dollars in subprime-backed securities.
- Dire forecasts estimate that the credit crunch caused by the mortgage problems will cause between $250 billion to $500 billion of losses at banks and brokerages before it’s done.
If you want to see how this kind of news looks on a price chart, consider the chart that we published in the latest Elliott Wave Financial Forecast. It shows how confidence in the mortgage market has simply fallen off a cliff. “The ABX Mortgage Indexes are akin to the eerie music that starts to play right before the goriest scenes in a horror movie,” write our analysts Steve Hochberg and Pete Kendall. Even prime-rated mortgages (the top line on the chart) seem to have been tainted by the cliff-diving exploits of the subprime and Alt-A mortgage indexes.
Editor’s note: Elliott Wave International invites you to read more about this Mortgage Mutiny chart in a special three-page excerpt from the November 2007
Elliott Wave Financial Forecast, called
“Transition to a Fear of Risk.”
The continuing repercussions of the subprime meltdown since two Bear Stearns’ hedge funds imploded in August remind me how closely this situation imitates the delayed punch of Hurricane Katrina in the summer of 2005. In fact, I wrote a column for Fox News on that very topic a few months ago, some of which is worth repeating.
* * * * *
[Excerpted from “Subprime Storm Mimics Katrina,” originally published July 30, 2007]
Wall Street may have reason to worry about a financial hurricane poised to do the same kind of damage Hurricane Katrina did — in terms of money and assets lost — in New Orleans in 2005. Given the latest storm warnings about subprime mortgages and the Dow’s dive last week, it looks like “Subprime Katrina” might become the financial storm of the decade.
Wall Street investment bankers who remember the devastation in New Orleans might want to start battening down the hatches. In fact, some of them seem to understand their pending doom as they try to cajole the rest of the world into thinking that the subprime (otherwise known as low-quality) mortgage contagion is contained. ‘Sure, sure, Bear Stearns got hit when its subprime hedge funds lost their value, but everyone else is O.K.,’ they say. ‘Let’s all heave one collective sigh of relief that we dodged that bullet.’
Does that attitude sound familiar? It’s exactly how the people of New Orleans felt for the 8-10 hours after Hurricane Katrina whipped up the Gulf Coast and dumped its rain. It was over; they had dodged the bullet. Their beautiful city that is built below sea level and surrounded by sea walls and levees was safe. That’s where Wall Street is right now – hoping the levees will hold as investment bankers try to sandbag the rest of us with lots of placating talk. Well, it turns out that New Orleans was about as safe as the subprime bonds that are now below their own “C” level.
Although Wall Street bankers have been doing one heckuva job, I think it’s too soon to breathe easy, just as it was too soon for those in the Big Easy to breathe easy. Here’s why: Wall Street was warned about the coming hurricane-force fall-out from subprime mortgages, and it ignored the warnings, buying up all the securities backed by subprime mortgages that it could. Now, Wall Street is having trouble selling more debt. It sounds like it may be too late for many Wall Street denizens to get out of town – and their positions – before the floodwaters start rising.
Remember, too, the finger-pointing and blaming that started as soon as the rest of the nation realized that the U.S. government was not doing enough to help New Orleans? The editors of The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast recognize a similar change in attitudes toward Wall Street:
“The unwinding process will be sped along by a flood of revelations about illicit hedge fund and investment banking activities. Just as Enron, Tyco and a host of other primary beneficiaries of the late 1990s bull market run became the focus of scandals, hedge funds and the banks that enabled them are starting to become a focal point for scrutiny.” (The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast, July 2007)
Then will come the final installment. Just as the U.S. government was slow to come to grips with the disaster in New Orleans so that people were left to fend for themselves, so too will investment bankers and investors have to fend for themselves. They may find themselves clutching their worthless paper and wishing someone would bail them out from the rooftops of their now-worthless homes.
* * * * *
Now, here we are at the end of November, and the situation for investors and investment banks has played out almost exactly as I outlined. Hardly anyone is coming out smelling like a rose. If anything it’s the opposite, as the stench from quarterly financial filings rises as banks reveal how many billions in dollars they must write off for their mortgage investments gone bad. Sadly, the conclusion to my Subprime Katrina column still holds true: “Heckuva Job Brownie – now known as Helicopter Ben Bernanke and his Federal Reserve team – won’t have any more luck picking up the pieces on Wall Street than FEMA did in New Orleans.”
Susan C. Walker writes for Elliott Wave International, a market forecasting and technical analysis company. She has been an associate editor with Inc. magazine, a newspaper writer and editor, an investor relations executive and a speechwriter for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Her columns also appear regularly on FoxNews.com.
November 12, 2007 at 8:08 pm · Filed under Forex, Financial
Disclaimer: Forex trading involves high risks, with the potential for substantial losses and is not suitable for all persons. The views expressed in this blogsite are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or opinions of AlterForex.
By Susan C. Walker, Elliott Wave International
When you’re caught in the middle of a bad storm, you don’t really care whether it’s a tropical depression or a full-strength hurricane. You just know you’re hanging on for dear life. The same idea applies to financial markets. When a market is trending up strongly, it’s hard to tell whether it’s just a bull market or a more dangerous financial mania.
The recent tremendous ride up for global and U.S. financial markets, including the Dow, looks and feels more like a mania than a mere bull, says Elliott Wave International analyst Peter Kendall. This distinction is important to recognize in the rising stage, because manias always result in a crash that takes them back beneath their starting point.
Kendall recently published his research into current financial manias throughout the world in SFO (Stocks, Futures and Options) magazine. The article, titled “Financial Manias and the Trade of a Lifetime,” suggests an even more stunning finish for the current manias: “The speed and global scope of the unfolding credit crisis suggest that most of the fast-rising markets of the last decade will crash in unison,” he writes.
Editor’s note: Elliott Wave International invites you to read the full five-page article with charts from the October 2007 SFO magazine by Elliott Wave International’s Pete Kendall called
“Financial Manias and the Trade of a Lifetime.”
As co-editor of
The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast, Kendall searches for trends that help traders to move in and out of markets. By comparing other historic manias with the impressive rise of the DJIA since the late 1970s, he focuses on the skyscraper pattern that they all have in common. The four historical manias are the Dutch Tulip mania of the 1630s, the South Sea bubble of 1720, the U.S. stock crash of 1921-1932 and the
dot.com bust of the 1990s and early 2000s. Once you can see the similarities, you will be better prepared to face the music when the crash comes. As Kendall writes, “once the belief that the markets will always rise becomes widespread, it actually signals the start of a price swing that tends to be a career-breaker for any trader who tries to oppose it.”He also discusses current manias, such as the Nikkei, which has yet to return to its start after a manic rise to its all-time high in December 1989, and the Dow, which reversed from its rise in 2000 but made a U-turn in 2002. The starting point for the Dow’s mania as shown in the chart included in the article is at the 1000 level.
Kendall, who is also writing a book about financial manias, titled The Mania Chronicles, describes five telltale signs that help an investor to tell the difference between a regular bull market and a mania. It’s a mania if:
1. There is no upside resistance, and rising prices seem to be perpetual.
2. Everyone in the market looks like an expert.
3. There is a flight from quality investments to riskier investments.
4. As financial bubbles pop in one area, they bubble up in others.
5. The crash after the peak takes back all the gains the mania made.
No. 5 can be viewed only with hindsight. But the first four signs provide essential clues to what’s shaping up in the markets.
“By studying past mania experiences, traders can gain valuable insight into the collective emotions that drive their markets,” writes Kendall. “It’s possible to make significant money in the advancing stages of a mania with no knowledge of its existence. But there is nothing like recognizing a mania for what it is in real time to help a trader keep those gains and deal with the relentless crash after it peaks.”
In the last part of the SFO article, he asks the key question, Are we at the peak yet? Find out his answer by reading the whole article for yourself.
Susan C. Walker writes for Elliott Wave International, a market forecasting and technical analysis company. She has been an associate editor with Inc. magazine, a newspaper writer and editor, an investor relations executive and a speechwriter for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Her columns also appear regularly on FoxNews.com.
October 8, 2007 at 4:01 pm · Filed under Forex, Financial
Disclaimer: Forex trading involves high risks, with the potential for substantial losses and is not suitable for all persons. The views expressed in this blogsite are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or opinions of AlterForex.
By Susan C. Walker, Elliott Wave International
Helen Mirren accepted her Emmy award for best actress in the mini-series, “Prime Suspect” with elegance and grace. Just the opposite of the tough detective superintendent character she plays who tracks down murder suspects in England. Who would Jane Tennison pick out as the prime suspect for the murder of the U.S. housing market and the resulting gruesome credit crunch?
Suspect No. 1 – Phil Spector
No – sorry, wrong case, wrong suspect. Spector has been on trial for the murder of a guest at his home (the judge declared a mistrial this week), but Spector has nothing to do with the subprime mortgage fallout and ensuing credit crunch. O.J. Simpson, who stands accused of trying to “recover” his sports memorabilia, is not the prime suspect either. If the crime doesn’t fit, you must acquit.
Suspect No. 2 – Alan Greenspan
Says that he didn’t catch on for a few years that subprime mortgages could create a problem for the economy. As chairman of the Federal Reserve, he let easy credit ride, which facilitated the housing bubble and the subsequent implosion. Could liken his behavior to supplying the gun to a rampaging murderer. Guilty of aiding and abetting, but he’s not necessarily the prime suspect.
Suspect No. 3 – Angelo Mozilo
Angelo Mozilo, CEO of Countrywide Financial (largest mortgage company in the United States), says he kept his staff writing subprime mortgages day and night, because if they didn’t, then home purchasers would just find someone else to give them a low-quality mortgage. Company went from writing 4.6% of its overall mortgages as subprimes and low-documentation loans in 2004 to 8.7% in 2006. Guilty of greed and a poor business plan but not murder.
Suspect No. 4 – S. & P. and Moody’s
Oh, whoops, say these rating agencies, we thought that once you sliced up a BBB security thinly enough and packaged it with other more desirable collateralized debt obligations that we could call it AAA. Did we mislead anybody? Again, aiding and abetting but not a prime suspect.
Suspect No. 5 – Goldman Sachs and other investment banks
Says that their investors wanted higher returns and that collateralized debt obligations spiced up with subprime mortgages served the purpose. And besides, they say, the rating agencies gave them an excellent rating. Guilty of acting like a fence but not the prime murder suspect.
The True Prime Suspect
All of these are worth a look as suspects, but the true prime suspect has neither a first name nor a last. It’s known as “social mood,” and its m.o. is “herding behavior.” That’s our real murderer, the one that quashed the hopes and dreams of those who believed that house prices would always go up. Social mood changed, and with it changed the idea of what were smart financing moves to purchase a house. Suddenly, as house prices began to fall and subprime mortgagees began to default on their loans, the stick house built on low-quality mortgages seemed like a really bad idea.
Who knew? When social mood was positive, mortgage writers pushed people who couldn’t really afford a mortgage into believing they could. Then they sold the mortgages to eager investment bankers who sliced them up into small packages of risk and re-packaged them with less risky securities. Then the ratings agencies gave their stamp of approval: AA? Why not AAA? And eager investors who wanted higher returns bought them up.
But now the game is up. When social mood turns from positive to negative, fear replaces greed, and people begin to see the riskiness for what it is. When social mood changes from positive to negative, markets turn from bullish to bearish. And no one can stop it – not even the Fed.
This is how Bob Prechter, president of Elliott Wave International, describes the phenomenon:
“Like credit inflation, credit deflation is in fact an intricate, interwoven process, whose initial impetus is a change in social mood from optimism toward pessimism. If you are still on the fence about this idea, ask yourself: What changed in the so-called “fundamentals” between June and August? The answer is: absolutely nothing. Interest rates did not budge; there were no indications of recession; there were no changes in bank lending policies; there were no chilling government edicts.
“The only thing that changed was people’s minds. One day sub-prime mortgages were a fine investment, and the next day they were toxic waste. There was no external cause of the change.… According to socionomic theory, the stock market is a sensitive indicator of such changes in mood. This is why The Elliott Wave Theorist has continually said that the financial structure will hold up as long as the stock market rises. A downturn occurred in mid-July, and its consequences in terms of negative social mood are becoming swiftly evident. Remember, C waves (see Elliott Wave Principle, Chapter 2) are when optimistic illusions finally disappear and fear takes over. Sounds like now.” [Elliott Wave Theorist, September 2007]
How To Protect Yourself from the Prime Suspect Who is Still on the Loose
Social mood has turned ugly and is likely to continue its murderous rampage, leaving the policymakers helpless. As analysts Steve Hochberg and Pete Kendall write in The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast: “The Fed does not “inject” liquidity; it only offers it. If nobody wants it, the inflation game is over. The determinant of that matter is the market. When bull markets turn to bear, confidence turns to fear, and a fearful people do not lend or borrow at the same rates as confident ones. The ultimate drivers of inflation and deflation are human mental states that the Fed cannot manipulate.”
What should you do to protect yourself in this time of falling home prices, a powerless Fed and a contracting economy? Bob Prechter wrote one of the best how-to books. It’s his business best-seller, titled, Conquer the Crash, How To Survive and Prosper in a Deflationary Depression. You might want to start there.
Editor’s Note: You can read a FREE 9-page chapter from Conquer the Crash –
You will learn the implications of the massive credit expansion, what triggers the change from boom times to recession, and more.
Susan C. Walker writes for Elliott Wave International, a market forecasting and technical analysis company. She has been an associate editor with Inc. magazine, a newspaper writer and editor, an investor relations executive and a speechwriter for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Her columns also appear regularly on FoxNews.com.
September 7, 2007 at 5:11 pm · Filed under Financial
Disclaimer: Forex trading involves high risks, with the potential for substantial losses and is not suitable for all persons. The views expressed in this blogsite are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or opinions of AlterForex.
By Susan C. Walker, Elliott Wave International
Central bankers who “follow the yellow brick road” end up in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, every Labor Day weekend for their annual symposium sponsored by – who else? – the Kansas City Fed. (Who can forget Judy Garland saying to her little dog, “Toto, I’ve got a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore,” in the 1939 movie, The Wizard of Oz?)
The Jackson Hole Resort serves as the Federal Reserve’s equivalent of the Emerald City, as Fed governors and presidents meet with central bankers and economists from around the world to discuss economic issues. This year, the symposium focused on housing and monetary policy. Usually, the Fed chairman kicks off the symposium and, this year, the new chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, did the honors. He closed his speech with these words:
“The interaction of housing, housing finance, and economic activity has for years been of central importance for understanding the behavior of the economy, and it will continue to be central to our thinking as we try to anticipate economic and financial developments.”
Then came the other speeches. And it seems that some of the guests in Emerald City were waiting for their chance to pull back the curtain and prove that the Wonderful Wizard of Oz isn’t such a wizard after all. Bloomberg reported that “Federal Reserve officials, wrestling with a housing recession that jeopardizes U.S. growth, got an earful from critics at a weekend retreat, arguing they should use regulation and interest rates to prevent asset-price bubbles.” Apparently, one academic paper presented at Jackson Hole graded the Fed an ‘F’ for the way it has handled the repercussions from the rise and fall of the housing market.
Truth be told, these folks are a little late to the table as critics of the Fed. We’re glad they’re joining us, but here’s what they still haven’t learned: It isn’t because the Federal Reserve messes up by allowing credit, asset and stock bubbles to form that it’s not a wizard. The Federal Reserve isn’t a wizard for one particular reason that it doesn’t want anybody to know – and that is that the Fed doesn’t lead the financial markets, it follows them.
People everywhere want to believe in the Fed’s wizardry. But all this talk about how the Fed will be able to help the U.S. economy and hold up the markets by cutting rates now is as much hooey as the Wizard of Oz promising Dorothy, the Scarecrow, the Tin Man and the Cowardly Lion that he could give them what they wanted: a return to Kansas, a brain, a heart, and courage. Because when the Fed does do something, it always comes after the markets have already made their moves.
If you don’t believe it, you should look at one chart from the most recent Elliott Wave Financial Forecast. It compares the movements in the Fed Funds rate with the movements of the 3-month U.S. Treasury Bill Yield. What does it reveal? That the Fed has followed the T-Bill yield up and down every step of the way since 2000. And the interesting question becomes this: Since the T-bill yield has dropped nearly two points since February, how soon will the Fed cut its rate to follow the market’s lead this time?
[Editor’s note: You can see this chart and read the Special Section it appears in by accessing the free report, The Unwonderful Wizardry of the Fed.]
We’ve got our own brains, heart and courage here at Elliott Wave International, and we’ve used them to explain over and over again that putting faith in the Fed to turn around the markets and the economy is blind faith indeed.
“This blind faith in the Fed’s power to hold up the economy and stocks epitomizes the following definition of magic offered by Teller of the illusionist and comedy team of Penn and Teller: a ‘theatrical linking of a cause with an effect that has no basis in physical reality, but that – in our hearts – ought to be.’” [September 2007, The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast]
Because, you see, what makes the markets move has less to do with what the unwizardly Fed does and more with changes in the mass psychology of all the people investing in those markets. The Elliott Wave Principle describes how bullish and bearish trends in the financial markets reflect changes in social mood, from positive to negative and back again. To extend the metaphor: The Fed can’t affect social mood anymore than the Wonderful Wizard of Oz could change the direction of the wind that brought his hot air balloon to the Land of Oz in the first place.
As our EWI analysts write, “With respect to the timing of the Federal Reserve Board rate cuts, we need to reiterate one key point. The market, not the Fed, sets rates.” Being able to understand this information puts you one step closer to clicking your ruby red shoes together and whispering those magic words: “There’s no place like home.” Once you land back in Kansas, your eyes will open, and you will see that an unwarranted faith in the Fed was just a bad dream.
Susan C. Walker writes for Elliott Wave International, a market forecasting and technical analysis company. She has been an associate editor with Inc. magazine, a newspaper writer and editor, an investor relations executive and a speechwriter for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Her columns also appear regularly on FoxNews.com.
August 28, 2007 at 5:22 pm · Filed under Financial
Disclaimer: Forex trading involves high risks, with the potential for substantial losses and is not suitable for all persons. The views expressed in this blogsite are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or opinions of AlterForex.
By Susan C. Walker, Elliott Wave International
Remember that catchy love song that Frank Sinatra made popular in the 1960s, “The Best Is Yet To Come”?
“The best is yet to come and, babe, won’t that be fine?
You think you’ve seen the sun, but you ain’t seen it shine.”
At the risk of mixing musical metaphors and styles, it looks more like the sun has deserted us right now in the financial markets, and we’re about to see “The Dark Side of the Moon,” the title of Pink Floyd’s 1973 smash album. With the subprime mortgage problems reaching farther and farther out to touch hedge funds, U.S. and European banks, mortgage companies and money-market funds, what we’re going to experience sounds more like “The Worst is Yet To Come.”
That’s because the financial markets must contend not only with the credit crunch brought on by rising foreclosures now; they must also deal with the repercussions from more foreclosures over the next 18 months as more adjustable-rate mortgages (whether subprime or not) reset from low teaser rates to higher interest-rate levels.
How bad can it get? Investment adviser John Mauldin recently published a month-by-month account of the dollar amount of mortgages that will be reset through 2008, and the largest reset amounts pop up in the first six months of next year. In fact, as he points out, the $197 billion of mortgage resets so far this year is “less than we will see in two months (February and March) of next year. The first six months of next year will see more than the total for 2007, or $521 billion.”
So, we haven’t even begun to feel the pain yet. It’s bad enough for the folks who will find that they can’t keep up with the higher mortgage payments and will have to move out of their homes. But the financial markets won’t be catching a break either. The antiseptic phrase used to describe the situation is “repricing risk.” That means that investors have woken up to the fact that the AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities and derivatives they invested in look more like junk bonds now. This eye-opener causes them to want higher yields from what they now see as riskier vehicles.
That new investor caution plays out this way: investment banks, hedge funds and any other entity that bought securities backed by subprime loans now find it hard to sell the darn things. It’s almost the same as homeowners trying to find buyers for their homes – nearly impossible in a market where home prices are falling. In the financial markets, it’s nearly impossible because no one even wants to attach a price to a collateralized debt obligation today for fear that it will be priced much lower tomorrow.
The Fed can try to calm such fears all it wants by lowering the discount rate and giving banks more time to pay back loans (from overnight to 30 days), but the real problem can’t be fixed with more access to credit. The fact is nobody wants any more of that. What they really want is cash to pay off their debts, be it a mortgage or an unwinding of a securities bet.
Wall Street’s denizens are in the dark about how much their schemes depend on the ocean of liquidity created by the bull market, say Elliott Wave International’s analysts, Steve Hochberg and Pete Kendall. They are particularly struck by the image of the Grim Reaper that Business Week magazine put on its cover recently with the headline, “Death Bonds:”
“The grim reaper is the perfect visage to welcome the arriving wave of liquidation; it will wreak havoc with their work. The field’s dark fate is clear in one fund manager’s description of what caused ‘forced sales’ at another fund: ‘The models work when they look at history, but not when history is all new.’ What’s ‘new’ is that for the first time in the experience of many model makers, confidence is on the run. As they rob Peter to pay Paul, all assets will be impacted in negative ways that do not compute in their models.” (The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast, August 2007)
And the bad news just keeps accumulating:
- Housing prices dropped 3.2% percent in the second quarter compared with last year, the largest drop since Standard & Poor’s started tracking home prices in 1987.
- CIT Group closed its mortgage unit this week, while Lehman Brothers closed its own last week. Mortgage companies that specialize in low-quality mortgages are either going out of business (London-based HSBC) or struggling (California-based Countrywide).
- The Wall Street Journal lists the number of fired employees at seven mortgage companies, including First Magnus (6,000), Capitol One’s Greenpoint (1,900), Associated Home Lenders (1,600) and Lehman (1,200), which totals more than 12,000 suddenly unemployed mortgage writers.
To top it off, Bloomberg reports that the subprime mess may lead to lower bonuses for the first time in five years on Wall Street, according to Options Group, a company that’s been tracking this kind of information for a decade.
Somewhere, the world’s smallest violin is playing a sad song for the fund managers and investment bankers who won’t be taking home that million-dollar-plus bonus this year. And Frank Sinatra is singing a sad refrain… “The worst is yet to come.”
Susan C. Walker writes for Elliott Wave International, a market forecasting and technical analysis company. She has been an associate editor with Inc. magazine, a newspaper writer and editor, an investor relations executive and a speechwriter for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Her columns also appear regularly on FoxNews.com.
For more information on the housing market and the credit crisis, access the free report, “The Real State of Real Estate,” from Elliott Wave International.
June 17, 2006 at 11:53 am · Filed under Forex
Disclaimer: Forex trading involves high risks, with the potential for substantial losses and is not suitable for all persons. The views expressed in this blogsite are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or opinions of AlterForex.
by: Benton Pena - CEO AlterForex.com
“Trading is an elusive beast to the uninitiated, filled with mystery and complexity.” - The Options Course.
First of all I will define what Forex is… Forex stands for Foreign Exchange, to clarify this term let’s talk about currency markets. Most countries have their own currencies. These currencies go up or down relative to each other based on a number of factors such as economic growth (present and future), interest rates, and supply and demand.
Most major currencies are quoted against the U.S. dollar.
Therefore, there will typically be an inverse relationship between the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The major currency futures traded at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange include the following:
- Euro (ECU or European currency unit).
- Swiss franc.
- British pound.
- Japanese yen.
- Canadian dollar.
If the U.S. dollar goes up, then the Japanese yen will drop along with other foreign currencies. Keep in mind that the Canadian and U.S. dollars move similarly due to their physical proximity and the closeness of their economies. Each of these currencies will then have a rate relative to each of the others. This cross-reference is referred to as the cross rate. The yen/pound, euro/dollar, and so on will have their own rates at which they may be traded.
Why are currencies traded? As you are probably aware, many products are sold across borders. A company may sell $100 million worth of computer equipment in Japan, and will likely be paid in yen. If the company prefers to be paid in U.S. dollars, it can go into the futures market or cash market “traded from bank to bank” to change its yen purchase. By selling yen futures contracts, the company can lock in its profits in U.S. dollars. Speculators are also active in the currency markets, buying and selling based on their predictions for the changes in cross rates. Trillions (yes, trillions) of dollars are traded each day in the currency markets, 24 hours a day.
More about Forex
Over the last three decades the foreign exchange market has become the world’s largest financial market, with over $1.5 trillion USD traded daily. Forex is part of the bank-to-bank currency market known as the 24-hour Interbank market. The Interbank market literally follows the sun around the world, moving from major banking centers of the United States to Australia, New Zealand to the Far East, to Europe then back to the United States.
A little bit of History
The foreign exchange market (FX or Forex) as we know it today originated in 1973. However, money has been around in one form or another since the time of Pharaohs. The Babylonians are credited with the first use of paper bills and receipts, but Middle Eastern moneychangers were the first currency traders who exchanged coins from one culture to another. During the middle ages, the need for another form of currency besides coins emerged as the method of choice. These paper bills represented transferable third-party payments of funds, making foreign currency exchange trading much easier for merchants and traders and causing these regional economies to flourish.
From the infantile stages of forex during the Middle Ages to WWI, the forex markets were relatively stable and without much speculative activity. After WWI, the forex markets became very volatile and speculative activity increased tenfold. Speculation in the forex market was not looked on as favorable by most institutions and the public in general. The Great Depression and the removal of the gold standard in 1931 created a serious lull in forex market activity. From 1931 until 1973, the forex market went through a series of changes. These changes greatly affected the global economies at the time and speculation in the forex markets during these times was little, if any.
The Bretton Woods Accord
International Monetary Fund - The first major transformation, the Bretton Woods Accord, occurred toward the end of World War II. The United States, Great Britain and France met at the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference in Bretton Woods, N.H. to design a new global economic order. The location was chosen because, at the time, the U.S. was the only country unscathed by war. Most of the major European countries were in shambles. Up until WWII, Great Britain’s currency, the Great British Pound, was the major currency by which most currencies were compared.
This changed when the Nazi campaign against Britain included a major counterfeiting effort against its currency. In fact, WWII vaulted the U.S. dollar from a failed currency after the stock market crash of 1929 to benchmark currency by which most other international currencies were compared. The Bretton Woods Accord was established to create a stable environment by which global economies could restore themselves. The Bretton Woods Accord established the pegging of currencies and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in hope of stabilizing the global economic situation.
Now, major currencies were pegged to the U.S. dollar. These currencies were allowed to fluctuate by one percent on either side of the set standard. When a currency’s exchange rate would approach the limit on either side of this standard the respective central bank would intervene to bring the exchange rate back into the accepted range. At the same time, the US dollar was pegged to gold at a price of $35 per ounce further bringing stability to other currencies and world forex situation.
The Bretton Woods Accord lasted until 1971. Ultimately, it failed, but did accomplish what its charter set out to do, which was to re-establish economic stability in Europe and Japan.
The Beginning of the free-floating system
After the Bretton Woods Accord came the Smithsonian Agreement in December of 1971. This agreement was similar to the Bretton Woods Accord, but allowed for a greater fluctuation band for the currencies. In 1972, the European community tried to move away from its dependency on the dollar. The European Joint Float was established by West Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxemburg. The agreement was similar to the Bretton Woods
Accord, but allowed a greater range of fluctuation in the currency values.
Both agreements made mistakes similar to the Bretton Woods Accord and in 1973 collapsed. The collapse of the Smithsonian agreement and the European Joint Float in 1973 signified the official switch to the free-floating system. This occurred by default as there were no new agreements to take their place. Governments were now free to peg their currencies, semi-peg or allow them to freely float. In 1978, the free-floating system was officially mandated.
In a final effort to gain independence from the dollar, Europe created the European Monetary System in July of 1978. Like all of the previous agreements, it failed in 1993.
The major currencies today move independently from other currencies. The currencies are traded by anyone who wishes. This has caused a recent influx of speculation by banks, hedge funds, brokerage houses and individuals. Central banks intervene on occasion to move or attempt to move currencies to their desired levels. The underlying factor that drives today’s forex markets, however, is supply and demand. The free-floating system is ideal for today’s forex markets. It will be interesting to see if in the future our planet endures another war similar to those of the early 20th century. If so, how will the forex markets be affected? Will the dollar be the safe haven it has been for so many years? Only time will tell.
final words:
Forex, FX or Foreign Exchange is the purchase or sale of a currency against sale or purchase of another. Trading currencies in the Forex market is in many ways more advantageous than trading stocks or futures. Look at all the advantages below available to our investors and traders:
- Trading Forex is a true 24-hour market.
- Low minimum investment compared to trading stocks.
- Forex trading automation due the using of statistical analysis software.
- Forex trading offer much greater buying power than day trading stocks, which only offers 4:1 margin.
- Small Trading Spreads - 3 Pips in major currency pairs
- Superior liquidity. Global currency market is a 1.3 trillion dollars a day market.
- Low transaction costs. It is much more cost-efficient to trade FX in terms of both commissions and transaction fees.
- Can make money in rising and falling markets.
There are no restrictions to sell currencies short, unlike stocks which
have to be sold short on an up tick rule. This means that as a Forex
trader you can make money just as easily in rising and falling markets.
more information about Forex and Forex Managed Accounts at http://www.alterforex.com
